Head-to-Head Analysis

Simple Truth Organic Sweet Thai Style Chili Sauce vs Miso dressing creamy style

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Simple Truth Organic Sweet Thai Style Chili Sauce

Simple Truth Organic Sweet Thai Style Chili Sauce

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Miso dressing creamy style

Miso dressing creamy style

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
152 kcal
Energy
267 kcal
33.3g
Sugars
16.7g
0g
Fat
20g
0g
Protein
0g
1g
Salt
2.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Simple Truth Organic Sweet Thai Style Chili Sauce and Miso dressing creamy style side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Simple Truth Organic Sweet Thai Style Chili Sauce is the clear winner. With 115 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Simple Truth Organic Sweet Thai Style Chili Sauce contains significantly more sugar (33.3g) compared to the milder Miso dressing creamy style (16.7g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Miso dressing creamy style is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Simple Truth Organic Sweet Thai Style Chili Sauce or Miso dressing creamy style?

It depends on your goals. Simple Truth Organic Sweet Thai Style Chili Sauce has 152 calories, while Miso dressing creamy style has 267 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Simple Truth Organic Sweet Thai Style Chili Sauce vegan?

No, Simple Truth Organic Sweet Thai Style Chili Sauce is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Simple Truth Organic Sweet Thai Style Chili Sauce and Miso dressing creamy style?

There is a difference of 115 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.