Head-to-Head Analysis

Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit vs Classic cinnamon breath mints

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit

Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Classic cinnamon breath mints

Classic cinnamon breath mints

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
210.5 kcal
Energy
5 kcal
52.6g
Sugars
1g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit and Classic cinnamon breath mints side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit is the more energy-dense option here, packing 206 more calories per 100g than Classic cinnamon breath mints. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit contains significantly more sugar (52.6316g) compared to the milder Classic cinnamon breath mints (1g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Classic cinnamon breath mints is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit or Classic cinnamon breath mints?

It depends on your goals. Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit has 210.5263 calories, while Classic cinnamon breath mints has 5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit vegan?

No, Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit and Classic cinnamon breath mints?

There is a difference of 206 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.