Head-to-Head Analysis

Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit vs Original, 40% Vegetable Oil Spread

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit

Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Original, 40% Vegetable Oil Spread

Original, 40% Vegetable Oil Spread

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
210.5 kcal
Energy
357 kcal
52.6g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
35.7g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
1.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit and Original, 40% Vegetable Oil Spread side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit is the clear winner. With 146 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit contains significantly more sugar (52.6316g) compared to the milder Original, 40% Vegetable Oil Spread (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original, 40% Vegetable Oil Spread is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit or Original, 40% Vegetable Oil Spread?

It depends on your goals. Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit has 210.5263 calories, while Original, 40% Vegetable Oil Spread has 357 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit vegan?

No, Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Simply fruit concord grape spreadable fruit and Original, 40% Vegetable Oil Spread?

There is a difference of 146 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.