Head-to-Head Analysis

Simply potatoes Southwest style hash browns vs Seaweed Salad

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Simply potatoes Southwest style hash browns

Simply potatoes Southwest style hash browns

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Seaweed Salad

Seaweed Salad

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
82.4 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
1.2g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
2.4g
Protein
0g
0.9g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Simply potatoes Southwest style hash browns and Seaweed Salad side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Simply potatoes Southwest style hash browns is the more energy-dense option here, packing 82 more calories per 100g than Seaweed Salad. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Simply potatoes Southwest style hash browns contains significantly more sugar (1.18g) compared to the milder Seaweed Salad (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Seaweed Salad is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Simply potatoes Southwest style hash browns offers a protein boost with 2.35g per 100g, outperforming Seaweed Salad in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Simply potatoes Southwest style hash browns or Seaweed Salad?

It depends on your goals. Simply potatoes Southwest style hash browns has 82.4 calories, while Seaweed Salad has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Simply potatoes Southwest style hash browns vegan?

No, Simply potatoes Southwest style hash browns is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Simply potatoes Southwest style hash browns and Seaweed Salad?

There is a difference of 82 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.