Head-to-Head Analysis

Simply Potatoes Traditional Mashed Potatoes vs Original beef stock for cooking

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Simply Potatoes Traditional Mashed Potatoes

Simply Potatoes Traditional Mashed Potatoes

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Original beef stock for cooking

Original beef stock for cooking

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
100 kcal
Energy
12 kcal
1.5g
Sugars
0.4g
4.6g
Fat
0g
2.3g
Protein
2.1g
0.9g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Simply Potatoes Traditional Mashed Potatoes and Original beef stock for cooking side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Simply Potatoes Traditional Mashed Potatoes is the more energy-dense option here, packing 88 more calories per 100g than Original beef stock for cooking. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Simply Potatoes Traditional Mashed Potatoes contains significantly more sugar (1.54g) compared to the milder Original beef stock for cooking (0.42g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original beef stock for cooking is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Simply Potatoes Traditional Mashed Potatoes or Original beef stock for cooking?

It depends on your goals. Simply Potatoes Traditional Mashed Potatoes has 100 calories, while Original beef stock for cooking has 12 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Simply Potatoes Traditional Mashed Potatoes vegan?

No, Simply Potatoes Traditional Mashed Potatoes is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Simply Potatoes Traditional Mashed Potatoes and Original beef stock for cooking?

There is a difference of 88 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.