Head-to-Head Analysis

Singles American vs Land o lakes traditional half and half

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Singles American

Singles American

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Land o lakes traditional half and half

Land o lakes traditional half and half

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
263 kcal
Energy
133.3 kcal
5.3g
Sugars
3.3g
15.8g
Fat
10g
15.8g
Protein
1.7g
2.8g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Singles American and Land o lakes traditional half and half side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Singles American is the more energy-dense option here, packing 130 more calories per 100g than Land o lakes traditional half and half. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Singles American contains significantly more sugar (5.26g) compared to the milder Land o lakes traditional half and half (3.3333333333333g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Land o lakes traditional half and half is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Singles American offers a protein boost with 15.8g per 100g, outperforming Land o lakes traditional half and half in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Singles American or Land o lakes traditional half and half?

It depends on your goals. Singles American has 263 calories, while Land o lakes traditional half and half has 133.33333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Singles American vegan?

No, Singles American is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Singles American and Land o lakes traditional half and half?

There is a difference of 130 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.