Head-to-Head Analysis

Sinister Swirl vs The New Primal, Turkey Stick, Light Peppered

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sinister Swirl

Sinister Swirl

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of The New Primal, Turkey Stick, Light Peppered

The New Primal, Turkey Stick, Light Peppered

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
536 kcal
Energy
161 kcal
10.7g
Sugars
0g
39.3g
Fat
3.6g
28.6g
Protein
25g
0.4g
Salt
2.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sinister Swirl and The New Primal, Turkey Stick, Light Peppered side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sinister Swirl is the more energy-dense option here, packing 375 more calories per 100g than The New Primal, Turkey Stick, Light Peppered. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sinister Swirl contains significantly more sugar (10.7g) compared to the milder The New Primal, Turkey Stick, Light Peppered (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, The New Primal, Turkey Stick, Light Peppered is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sinister Swirl offers a protein boost with 28.6g per 100g, outperforming The New Primal, Turkey Stick, Light Peppered in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sinister Swirl or The New Primal, Turkey Stick, Light Peppered?

It depends on your goals. Sinister Swirl has 536 calories, while The New Primal, Turkey Stick, Light Peppered has 161 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sinister Swirl vegan?

No, Sinister Swirl is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sinister Swirl and The New Primal, Turkey Stick, Light Peppered?

There is a difference of 375 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.