Head-to-Head Analysis

Skim Milk vs Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Skim Milk

Skim Milk

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy

Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
37.5 kcal
Energy
333.3 kcal
5g
Sugars
46.7g
0.4g
Fat
0g
3.3g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Skim Milk and Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Skim Milk is the clear winner. With 296 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Skim Milk takes the lead with only 5g of sugar per 100g, whereas Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy contains 46.666666666667g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Skim Milk offers a protein boost with 3.33g per 100g, outperforming Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Skim Milk or Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy?

Skim Milk appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Skim Milk vegan?

No, Skim Milk is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Skim Milk and Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy?

There is a difference of 296 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.