Head-to-Head Analysis

Skinless & Boneless Wild Pink Salmon vs Wild Albacore Tuna

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Skinless & Boneless Wild Pink Salmon

Skinless & Boneless Wild Pink Salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Wild Albacore Tuna

Wild Albacore Tuna

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
106 kcal
Energy
127 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
2.9g
Fat
3.5g
21.2g
Protein
23.2g
0.4g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Skinless & Boneless Wild Pink Salmon and Wild Albacore Tuna side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Skinless & Boneless Wild Pink Salmon is the clear winner. With 21 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Skinless & Boneless Wild Pink Salmon or Wild Albacore Tuna?

It depends on your goals. Skinless & Boneless Wild Pink Salmon has 106 calories, while Wild Albacore Tuna has 127 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Skinless & Boneless Wild Pink Salmon vegan?

No, Skinless & Boneless Wild Pink Salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Skinless & Boneless Wild Pink Salmon and Wild Albacore Tuna?

There is a difference of 21 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.