Head-to-Head Analysis

Skipjack wild tuna in water vs Cento, flat fillet anchovies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Skipjack wild tuna in water

Skipjack wild tuna in water

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Cento, flat fillet anchovies

Cento, flat fillet anchovies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
106 kcal
Energy
179 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0.9g
Fat
8g
23.9g
Protein
27g
0.5g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Skipjack wild tuna in water and Cento, flat fillet anchovies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Skipjack wild tuna in water is the clear winner. With 73 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Skipjack wild tuna in water or Cento, flat fillet anchovies?

It depends on your goals. Skipjack wild tuna in water has 106 calories, while Cento, flat fillet anchovies has 179 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Skipjack wild tuna in water vegan?

No, Skipjack wild tuna in water is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Skipjack wild tuna in water and Cento, flat fillet anchovies?

There is a difference of 73 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.