Skipjack wild tuna in water vs Fisha Tuna Chunk Light Tuna in Water
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Skipjack wild tuna in water
Fisha Tuna Chunk Light Tuna in Water
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Skipjack wild tuna in water and Fisha Tuna Chunk Light Tuna in Water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Skipjack wild tuna in water is the more energy-dense option here, packing 8 more calories per 100g than Fisha Tuna Chunk Light Tuna in Water. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
Looking to build muscle? Skipjack wild tuna in water offers a protein boost with 23.9g per 100g, outperforming Fisha Tuna Chunk Light Tuna in Water in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Skipjack wild tuna in water or Fisha Tuna Chunk Light Tuna in Water?
It depends on your goals. Skipjack wild tuna in water has 106 calories, while Fisha Tuna Chunk Light Tuna in Water has 98 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Skipjack wild tuna in water vegan?
No, Skipjack wild tuna in water is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Skipjack wild tuna in water and Fisha Tuna Chunk Light Tuna in Water?
There is a difference of 8 calories per 100g between the two products.
