Head-to-Head Analysis

Skipjack wild tuna in water vs Solod white albacore tune

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Skipjack wild tuna in water

Skipjack wild tuna in water

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Solod white albacore tune

Solod white albacore tune

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
106 kcal
Energy
97.3 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0.9g
Fat
0.9g
23.9g
Protein
23g
0.5g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Skipjack wild tuna in water and Solod white albacore tune side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Skipjack wild tuna in water is the more energy-dense option here, packing 9 more calories per 100g than Solod white albacore tune. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Skipjack wild tuna in water or Solod white albacore tune?

It depends on your goals. Skipjack wild tuna in water has 106 calories, while Solod white albacore tune has 97.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Skipjack wild tuna in water vegan?

No, Skipjack wild tuna in water is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Skipjack wild tuna in water and Solod white albacore tune?

There is a difference of 9 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.