Head-to-Head Analysis

Sliced Bacon Hardwood Smoked vs Sweet BBQ Flavored Chicken Strips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sliced Bacon Hardwood Smoked

Sliced Bacon Hardwood Smoked

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet BBQ Flavored Chicken Strips

Sweet BBQ Flavored Chicken Strips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
466.7 kcal
Energy
269 kcal
0g
Sugars
8.5g
40g
Fat
11.3g
26.7g
Protein
17g
4.3g
Salt
1.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sliced Bacon Hardwood Smoked and Sweet BBQ Flavored Chicken Strips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sliced Bacon Hardwood Smoked is the more energy-dense option here, packing 198 more calories per 100g than Sweet BBQ Flavored Chicken Strips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Sliced Bacon Hardwood Smoked takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet BBQ Flavored Chicken Strips contains 8.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Sliced Bacon Hardwood Smoked offers a protein boost with 26.666666666667g per 100g, outperforming Sweet BBQ Flavored Chicken Strips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sliced Bacon Hardwood Smoked or Sweet BBQ Flavored Chicken Strips?

It depends on your goals. Sliced Bacon Hardwood Smoked has 466.66666666667 calories, while Sweet BBQ Flavored Chicken Strips has 269 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sliced Bacon Hardwood Smoked vegan?

No, Sliced Bacon Hardwood Smoked is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sliced Bacon Hardwood Smoked and Sweet BBQ Flavored Chicken Strips?

There is a difference of 198 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.