Sliced Beets vs Con Azafran
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Sliced Beets
Con Azafran
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Sliced Beets and Con Azafran side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Sliced Beets is the more energy-dense option here, packing 29 more calories per 100g than Con Azafran. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Sliced Beets contains significantly more sugar (5g) compared to the milder Con Azafran (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Con Azafran is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Sliced Beets or Con Azafran?
It depends on your goals. Sliced Beets has 29.2 calories, while Con Azafran has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Sliced Beets vegan?
No, Sliced Beets is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Sliced Beets and Con Azafran?
There is a difference of 29 calories per 100g between the two products.
