Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin vs Bells & Stars
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin
Bells & Stars
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin and Bells & Stars side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin is the clear winner. With 27 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Bells & Stars contains 10g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin offers a protein boost with 22.6g per 100g, outperforming Bells & Stars in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin or Bells & Stars?
Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin vegan?
No, Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin and Bells & Stars?
There is a difference of 27 calories per 100g between the two products.
