Head-to-Head Analysis

Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin vs Rasberry Sugar Free gum

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin

Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Rasberry Sugar Free gum

Rasberry Sugar Free gum

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
143 kcal
Energy
3 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
6g
Fat
0g
22.6g
Protein
0g
0.9g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin and Rasberry Sugar Free gum side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin is the more energy-dense option here, packing 140 more calories per 100g than Rasberry Sugar Free gum. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin offers a protein boost with 22.6g per 100g, outperforming Rasberry Sugar Free gum in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin or Rasberry Sugar Free gum?

It depends on your goals. Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin has 143 calories, while Rasberry Sugar Free gum has 3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin vegan?

No, Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sliced Grass Beef Sirloin and Rasberry Sugar Free gum?

There is a difference of 140 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.