Head-to-Head Analysis

Sliced Grass Fed Beef vs Wild Hot Snack Sticks

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sliced Grass Fed Beef

Sliced Grass Fed Beef

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Wild Hot Snack Sticks

Wild Hot Snack Sticks

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
143 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
6g
Fat
12g
22.6g
Protein
5g
0.9g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sliced Grass Fed Beef and Wild Hot Snack Sticks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sliced Grass Fed Beef is the clear winner. With 357 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Sliced Grass Fed Beef offers a protein boost with 22.6g per 100g, outperforming Wild Hot Snack Sticks in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sliced Grass Fed Beef or Wild Hot Snack Sticks?

It depends on your goals. Sliced Grass Fed Beef has 143 calories, while Wild Hot Snack Sticks has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sliced Grass Fed Beef vegan?

No, Sliced Grass Fed Beef is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sliced Grass Fed Beef and Wild Hot Snack Sticks?

There is a difference of 357 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.