Head-to-Head Analysis

Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin vs Milk Classic] Rice Cracker (Muskmelon Flavor)

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin

Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Milk Classic] Rice Cracker (Muskmelon Flavor)

Milk Classic] Rice Cracker (Muskmelon Flavor)

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
1380 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin and Milk Classic] Rice Cracker (Muskmelon Flavor) side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin is the clear winner. With 1380 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin or Milk Classic] Rice Cracker (Muskmelon Flavor)?

It depends on your goals. Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin has 0 calories, while Milk Classic] Rice Cracker (Muskmelon Flavor) has 1380 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin vegan?

No, Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin and Milk Classic] Rice Cracker (Muskmelon Flavor)?

There is a difference of 1380 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.