Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin vs Chicken Franks
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin
Chicken Franks
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin and Chicken Franks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin is the clear winner. With 107 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
Looking to build muscle? Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin offers a protein boost with 22.6g per 100g, outperforming Chicken Franks in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin or Chicken Franks?
It depends on your goals. Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin has 143 calories, while Chicken Franks has 250 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin vegan?
No, Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin and Chicken Franks?
There is a difference of 107 calories per 100g between the two products.
