Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin vs Nabisco ritz crackers roasted vegetable 1x13.300 oz
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin
Nabisco ritz crackers roasted vegetable 1x13.300 oz
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin and Nabisco ritz crackers roasted vegetable 1x13.300 oz side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin is the clear winner. With 357 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Nabisco ritz crackers roasted vegetable 1x13.300 oz contains 6.25g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin offers a protein boost with 22.6g per 100g, outperforming Nabisco ritz crackers roasted vegetable 1x13.300 oz in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin or Nabisco ritz crackers roasted vegetable 1x13.300 oz?
Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin vegan?
No, Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin and Nabisco ritz crackers roasted vegetable 1x13.300 oz?
There is a difference of 357 calories per 100g between the two products.
