Sliced ham vs Chili con carne with beans
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Sliced ham
Chili con carne with beans
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Sliced ham and Chili con carne with beans side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Sliced ham is the clear winner. With 23 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Sliced ham contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Chili con carne with beans (0.833g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chili con carne with beans is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Sliced ham offers a protein boost with 14.29g per 100g, outperforming Chili con carne with beans in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Sliced ham or Chili con carne with beans?
It depends on your goals. Sliced ham has 89 calories, while Chili con carne with beans has 112 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Sliced ham vegan?
No, Sliced ham is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Sliced ham and Chili con carne with beans?
There is a difference of 23 calories per 100g between the two products.
