Head-to-Head Analysis

Sliced ham vs GRASS-FED GROUND BEEF

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sliced ham

Sliced ham

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of GRASS-FED GROUND BEEF

GRASS-FED GROUND BEEF

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
89 kcal
Energy
214 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
1.8g
Fat
15.2g
14.3g
Protein
18.8g
1.8g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sliced ham and GRASS-FED GROUND BEEF side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sliced ham is the clear winner. With 125 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sliced ham contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder GRASS-FED GROUND BEEF (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, GRASS-FED GROUND BEEF is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sliced ham or GRASS-FED GROUND BEEF?

It depends on your goals. Sliced ham has 89 calories, while GRASS-FED GROUND BEEF has 214 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sliced ham vegan?

No, Sliced ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sliced ham and GRASS-FED GROUND BEEF?

There is a difference of 125 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.