Head-to-Head Analysis

Sliced Ham vs Seitan, Traditional

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sliced Ham

Sliced Ham

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Seitan, Traditional

Seitan, Traditional

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
158 kcal
8.3g
Sugars
0g
3g
Fat
0.9g
16.7g
Protein
31.6g
2.4g
Salt
1.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sliced Ham and Seitan, Traditional side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sliced Ham is the clear winner. With 158 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sliced Ham contains significantly more sugar (8.33g) compared to the milder Seitan, Traditional (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Seitan, Traditional is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sliced Ham or Seitan, Traditional?

It depends on your goals. Sliced Ham has 0 calories, while Seitan, Traditional has 158 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sliced Ham vegan?

No, Sliced Ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sliced Ham and Seitan, Traditional?

There is a difference of 158 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.