Head-to-Head Analysis

Sliced Kalamata Greek Olives vs Sliced Golden Greek Peperoncini

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sliced Kalamata Greek Olives

Sliced Kalamata Greek Olives

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sliced Golden Greek Peperoncini

Sliced Golden Greek Peperoncini

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
281 kcal
Energy
16.7 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
28.1g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
3.3g
Salt
3.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sliced Kalamata Greek Olives and Sliced Golden Greek Peperoncini side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sliced Kalamata Greek Olives is the more energy-dense option here, packing 264 more calories per 100g than Sliced Golden Greek Peperoncini. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sliced Kalamata Greek Olives or Sliced Golden Greek Peperoncini?

It depends on your goals. Sliced Kalamata Greek Olives has 281 calories, while Sliced Golden Greek Peperoncini has 16.7 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sliced Kalamata Greek Olives vegan?

No, Sliced Kalamata Greek Olives is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sliced Kalamata Greek Olives and Sliced Golden Greek Peperoncini?

There is a difference of 264 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.