Slivered almonds vs Condeza cuban crackers
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Slivered almonds
Condeza cuban crackers
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Slivered almonds and Condeza cuban crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Slivered almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 174 more calories per 100g than Condeza cuban crackers. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Slivered almonds contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Condeza cuban crackers (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Condeza cuban crackers is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Slivered almonds offers a protein boost with 21.4g per 100g, outperforming Condeza cuban crackers in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Slivered almonds or Condeza cuban crackers?
It depends on your goals. Slivered almonds has 607 calories, while Condeza cuban crackers has 433.33333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Slivered almonds vegan?
No, Slivered almonds is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Slivered almonds and Condeza cuban crackers?
There is a difference of 174 calories per 100g between the two products.
