Sloppy Joe With Natural Ham, Swiss Cheese Cole Slaw & Russian Dressing vs Potato chips
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Sloppy Joe With Natural Ham, Swiss Cheese Cole Slaw & Russian Dressing
Potato chips
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Sloppy Joe With Natural Ham, Swiss Cheese Cole Slaw & Russian Dressing and Potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Sloppy Joe With Natural Ham, Swiss Cheese Cole Slaw & Russian Dressing is the clear winner. With 175 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Sloppy Joe With Natural Ham, Swiss Cheese Cole Slaw & Russian Dressing contains significantly more sugar (3.08g) compared to the milder Potato chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Sloppy Joe With Natural Ham, Swiss Cheese Cole Slaw & Russian Dressing offers a protein boost with 22.9g per 100g, outperforming Potato chips in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Sloppy Joe With Natural Ham, Swiss Cheese Cole Slaw & Russian Dressing or Potato chips?
It depends on your goals. Sloppy Joe With Natural Ham, Swiss Cheese Cole Slaw & Russian Dressing has 361 calories, while Potato chips has 536 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Sloppy Joe With Natural Ham, Swiss Cheese Cole Slaw & Russian Dressing vegan?
No, Sloppy Joe With Natural Ham, Swiss Cheese Cole Slaw & Russian Dressing is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Sloppy Joe With Natural Ham, Swiss Cheese Cole Slaw & Russian Dressing and Potato chips?
There is a difference of 175 calories per 100g between the two products.
