Head-to-Head Analysis

Slow Churned Cookie Dough vs Icelandic Style Skyr 1.5% Lowfat Vanilla Yogurt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Slow Churned Cookie Dough

Slow Churned Cookie Dough

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Icelandic Style Skyr 1.5% Lowfat Vanilla Yogurt

Icelandic Style Skyr 1.5% Lowfat Vanilla Yogurt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
186 kcal
Energy
86.7 kcal
20.9g
Sugars
5.3g
5.2g
Fat
1.3g
3.5g
Protein
10g
0.2g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Slow Churned Cookie Dough and Icelandic Style Skyr 1.5% Lowfat Vanilla Yogurt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Slow Churned Cookie Dough is the more energy-dense option here, packing 99 more calories per 100g than Icelandic Style Skyr 1.5% Lowfat Vanilla Yogurt. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Slow Churned Cookie Dough contains significantly more sugar (20.9g) compared to the milder Icelandic Style Skyr 1.5% Lowfat Vanilla Yogurt (5.33g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Icelandic Style Skyr 1.5% Lowfat Vanilla Yogurt is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Slow Churned Cookie Dough or Icelandic Style Skyr 1.5% Lowfat Vanilla Yogurt?

It depends on your goals. Slow Churned Cookie Dough has 186 calories, while Icelandic Style Skyr 1.5% Lowfat Vanilla Yogurt has 86.7 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Slow Churned Cookie Dough vegan?

No, Slow Churned Cookie Dough is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Slow Churned Cookie Dough and Icelandic Style Skyr 1.5% Lowfat Vanilla Yogurt?

There is a difference of 99 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.