Head-to-Head Analysis

Slow Churned Double Fudge Brownie vs Strawberry applesauce

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Slow Churned Double Fudge Brownie

Slow Churned Double Fudge Brownie

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Strawberry applesauce

Strawberry applesauce

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
176 kcal
Energy
79.6 kcal
22.4g
Sugars
18.6g
4.7g
Fat
0g
4.7g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Slow Churned Double Fudge Brownie and Strawberry applesauce side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Slow Churned Double Fudge Brownie is the more energy-dense option here, packing 96 more calories per 100g than Strawberry applesauce. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Slow Churned Double Fudge Brownie contains significantly more sugar (22.4g) compared to the milder Strawberry applesauce (18.58407079646g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Strawberry applesauce is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Slow Churned Double Fudge Brownie offers a protein boost with 4.71g per 100g, outperforming Strawberry applesauce in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Slow Churned Double Fudge Brownie or Strawberry applesauce?

It depends on your goals. Slow Churned Double Fudge Brownie has 176 calories, while Strawberry applesauce has 79.646017699115 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Slow Churned Double Fudge Brownie vegan?

No, Slow Churned Double Fudge Brownie is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Slow Churned Double Fudge Brownie and Strawberry applesauce?

There is a difference of 96 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.