Head-to-Head Analysis

Slow churned light ice cream vs Strawberry Fruit Bar/Paleta

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Slow churned light ice cream

Slow churned light ice cream

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Strawberry Fruit Bar/Paleta

Strawberry Fruit Bar/Paleta

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
177.4 kcal
Energy
86.7 kcal
21g
Sugars
10.7g
4.8g
Fat
0g
3.2g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Slow churned light ice cream and Strawberry Fruit Bar/Paleta side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Slow churned light ice cream is the more energy-dense option here, packing 91 more calories per 100g than Strawberry Fruit Bar/Paleta. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Slow churned light ice cream contains significantly more sugar (20.97g) compared to the milder Strawberry Fruit Bar/Paleta (10.7g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Strawberry Fruit Bar/Paleta is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Slow churned light ice cream offers a protein boost with 3.23g per 100g, outperforming Strawberry Fruit Bar/Paleta in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Slow churned light ice cream or Strawberry Fruit Bar/Paleta?

It depends on your goals. Slow churned light ice cream has 177.42 calories, while Strawberry Fruit Bar/Paleta has 86.7 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Slow churned light ice cream vegan?

No, Slow churned light ice cream is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Slow churned light ice cream and Strawberry Fruit Bar/Paleta?

There is a difference of 91 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.