Slow Cooked Uncured Ham vs Lightly Salted Pistachios
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Slow Cooked Uncured Ham
Lightly Salted Pistachios
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Slow Cooked Uncured Ham and Lightly Salted Pistachios side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Slow Cooked Uncured Ham is the clear winner. With 373 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Slow Cooked Uncured Ham takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Lightly Salted Pistachios contains 7.14g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Slow Cooked Uncured Ham offers a protein boost with 36.4g per 100g, outperforming Lightly Salted Pistachios in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Slow Cooked Uncured Ham or Lightly Salted Pistachios?
Slow Cooked Uncured Ham appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Slow Cooked Uncured Ham vegan?
No, Slow Cooked Uncured Ham is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Slow Cooked Uncured Ham and Lightly Salted Pistachios?
There is a difference of 373 calories per 100g between the two products.
