Head-to-Head Analysis

Smoked oysters vs Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Smoked oysters

Smoked oysters

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans

Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
137 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
2.6g
0g
Protein
28.1g
0g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Smoked oysters and Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Smoked oysters is the clear winner. With 137 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Smoked oysters or Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans?

It depends on your goals. Smoked oysters has 0 calories, while Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans has 137 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Smoked oysters vegan?

No, Smoked oysters is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Smoked oysters and Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans?

There is a difference of 137 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.