Head-to-Head Analysis

Smoothables Diced Purple Blend vs Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Smoothables Diced Purple Blend

Smoothables Diced Purple Blend

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips

Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
61.9 kcal
Energy
520 kcal
12.4g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
28g
0g
Protein
4g
0g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Smoothables Diced Purple Blend and Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Smoothables Diced Purple Blend is the clear winner. With 458 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Smoothables Diced Purple Blend contains significantly more sugar (12.4g) compared to the milder Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Smoothables Diced Purple Blend or Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips?

It depends on your goals. Smoothables Diced Purple Blend has 61.9 calories, while Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips has 520 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Smoothables Diced Purple Blend vegan?

No, Smoothables Diced Purple Blend is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Smoothables Diced Purple Blend and Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips?

There is a difference of 458 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.