Head-to-Head Analysis

Snack N Go Tuna vs Sweet Chili

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Snack N Go Tuna

Snack N Go Tuna

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet Chili

Sweet Chili

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
213 kcal
Energy
464 kcal
0.9g
Sugars
10.7g
7.4g
Fat
14.3g
25.9g
Protein
7.1g
0.9g
Salt
1.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Snack N Go Tuna and Sweet Chili side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Snack N Go Tuna is the clear winner. With 251 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Snack N Go Tuna takes the lead with only 0.926g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet Chili contains 10.7g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Snack N Go Tuna offers a protein boost with 25.9g per 100g, outperforming Sweet Chili in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Snack N Go Tuna or Sweet Chili?

Snack N Go Tuna appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Snack N Go Tuna vegan?

No, Snack N Go Tuna is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Snack N Go Tuna and Sweet Chili?

There is a difference of 251 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.