Head-to-Head Analysis

Snack Pack - Selena Gomez Oreos vs Soft Australian Licorice Original Flavor

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Snack Pack - Selena Gomez Oreos

Snack Pack - Selena Gomez Oreos

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Soft Australian Licorice Original Flavor

Soft Australian Licorice Original Flavor

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
484 kcal
Energy
333 kcal
41.5g
Sugars
33.3g
24.2g
Fat
3.3g
0g
Protein
3.3g
0.5g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Snack Pack - Selena Gomez Oreos and Soft Australian Licorice Original Flavor side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Snack Pack - Selena Gomez Oreos is the more energy-dense option here, packing 151 more calories per 100g than Soft Australian Licorice Original Flavor. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Snack Pack - Selena Gomez Oreos contains significantly more sugar (41.5g) compared to the milder Soft Australian Licorice Original Flavor (33.3g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Soft Australian Licorice Original Flavor is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Snack Pack - Selena Gomez Oreos or Soft Australian Licorice Original Flavor?

It depends on your goals. Snack Pack - Selena Gomez Oreos has 484 calories, while Soft Australian Licorice Original Flavor has 333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Snack Pack - Selena Gomez Oreos vegan?

No, Snack Pack - Selena Gomez Oreos is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Snack Pack - Selena Gomez Oreos and Soft Australian Licorice Original Flavor?

There is a difference of 151 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.