Head-to-Head Analysis

Snack packs vs Gamesa, emperador, sandwich cookies, pecan

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Snack packs

Snack packs

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Gamesa, emperador, sandwich cookies, pecan

Gamesa, emperador, sandwich cookies, pecan

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
464.3 kcal
Energy
471 kcal
25g
Sugars
32.4g
14.3g
Fat
17.7g
7.1g
Protein
5.9g
0.6g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Snack packs and Gamesa, emperador, sandwich cookies, pecan side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Snack packs is the clear winner. With 7 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Snack packs takes the lead with only 25g of sugar per 100g, whereas Gamesa, emperador, sandwich cookies, pecan contains 32.35g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Snack packs or Gamesa, emperador, sandwich cookies, pecan?

Snack packs appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Snack packs vegan?

No, Snack packs is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Snack packs and Gamesa, emperador, sandwich cookies, pecan?

There is a difference of 7 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.