Head-to-Head Analysis

Sockeye Salmon vs Sweet & Spicy Chunk Light Tuna

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sockeye Salmon

Sockeye Salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet & Spicy Chunk Light Tuna

Sweet & Spicy Chunk Light Tuna

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
161 kcal
Energy
108 kcal
0g
Sugars
5.4g
8.9g
Fat
0g
21.4g
Protein
20.3g
0.1g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sockeye Salmon and Sweet & Spicy Chunk Light Tuna side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sockeye Salmon is the more energy-dense option here, packing 53 more calories per 100g than Sweet & Spicy Chunk Light Tuna. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Sockeye Salmon takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet & Spicy Chunk Light Tuna contains 5.41g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sockeye Salmon or Sweet & Spicy Chunk Light Tuna?

It depends on your goals. Sockeye Salmon has 161 calories, while Sweet & Spicy Chunk Light Tuna has 108 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sockeye Salmon vegan?

No, Sockeye Salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sockeye Salmon and Sweet & Spicy Chunk Light Tuna?

There is a difference of 53 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.