Head-to-Head Analysis

Soft Baked Apple Filled Bars Strawberry vs Chum Fruit Bites

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Soft Baked Apple Filled Bars Strawberry

Soft Baked Apple Filled Bars Strawberry

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chum Fruit Bites

Chum Fruit Bites

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
378 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
27g
Sugars
0g
10.8g
Fat
0g
2.7g
Protein
0g
1.4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Soft Baked Apple Filled Bars Strawberry and Chum Fruit Bites side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Soft Baked Apple Filled Bars Strawberry is the more energy-dense option here, packing 378 more calories per 100g than Chum Fruit Bites. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Soft Baked Apple Filled Bars Strawberry contains significantly more sugar (27g) compared to the milder Chum Fruit Bites (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chum Fruit Bites is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Soft Baked Apple Filled Bars Strawberry offers a protein boost with 2.7g per 100g, outperforming Chum Fruit Bites in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Soft Baked Apple Filled Bars Strawberry or Chum Fruit Bites?

It depends on your goals. Soft Baked Apple Filled Bars Strawberry has 378 calories, while Chum Fruit Bites has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Soft Baked Apple Filled Bars Strawberry vegan?

No, Soft Baked Apple Filled Bars Strawberry is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Soft Baked Apple Filled Bars Strawberry and Chum Fruit Bites?

There is a difference of 378 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.