Head-to-Head Analysis

Soft Baked Breakfast Bars Strawberry vs CHOCOLATE-COVERED HUNKS ALMONDS + SEA SALT

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Soft Baked Breakfast Bars Strawberry

Soft Baked Breakfast Bars Strawberry

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of CHOCOLATE-COVERED HUNKS ALMONDS + SEA SALT

CHOCOLATE-COVERED HUNKS ALMONDS + SEA SALT

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
351 kcal
Energy
607 kcal
29.7g
Sugars
14.3g
9.5g
Fat
46.4g
5.4g
Protein
17.9g
0.9g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Soft Baked Breakfast Bars Strawberry and CHOCOLATE-COVERED HUNKS ALMONDS + SEA SALT side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Soft Baked Breakfast Bars Strawberry is the clear winner. With 256 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Soft Baked Breakfast Bars Strawberry contains significantly more sugar (29.7g) compared to the milder CHOCOLATE-COVERED HUNKS ALMONDS + SEA SALT (14.3g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, CHOCOLATE-COVERED HUNKS ALMONDS + SEA SALT is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Soft Baked Breakfast Bars Strawberry or CHOCOLATE-COVERED HUNKS ALMONDS + SEA SALT?

It depends on your goals. Soft Baked Breakfast Bars Strawberry has 351 calories, while CHOCOLATE-COVERED HUNKS ALMONDS + SEA SALT has 607 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Soft Baked Breakfast Bars Strawberry vegan?

No, Soft Baked Breakfast Bars Strawberry is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Soft Baked Breakfast Bars Strawberry and CHOCOLATE-COVERED HUNKS ALMONDS + SEA SALT?

There is a difference of 256 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.