Head-to-Head Analysis

Soft Baked Chocolate Chip Cookies vs Sea Salty Crackers with hidden veggies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Soft Baked Chocolate Chip Cookies

Soft Baked Chocolate Chip Cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sea Salty Crackers with hidden veggies

Sea Salty Crackers with hidden veggies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
392.9 kcal
Energy
466.7 kcal
32.1g
Sugars
3.3g
17.9g
Fat
20g
3.6g
Protein
10g
0.7g
Salt
3.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Soft Baked Chocolate Chip Cookies and Sea Salty Crackers with hidden veggies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Soft Baked Chocolate Chip Cookies is the clear winner. With 74 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Soft Baked Chocolate Chip Cookies contains significantly more sugar (32.142857142857g) compared to the milder Sea Salty Crackers with hidden veggies (3.3333333333333g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sea Salty Crackers with hidden veggies is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Soft Baked Chocolate Chip Cookies or Sea Salty Crackers with hidden veggies?

It depends on your goals. Soft Baked Chocolate Chip Cookies has 392.85714285714 calories, while Sea Salty Crackers with hidden veggies has 466.66666666667 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Soft Baked Chocolate Chip Cookies vegan?

No, Soft Baked Chocolate Chip Cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Soft Baked Chocolate Chip Cookies and Sea Salty Crackers with hidden veggies?

There is a difference of 74 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.