Head-to-Head Analysis

Soft Baked Mini Cookies Red Velvet vs Honey Mustard Double Crunch Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Soft Baked Mini Cookies Red Velvet

Soft Baked Mini Cookies Red Velvet

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Honey Mustard Double Crunch Potato Chips

Honey Mustard Double Crunch Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
29.2g
Sugars
7.1g
25g
Fat
28.6g
4.2g
Protein
7.1g
0.7g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Soft Baked Mini Cookies Red Velvet and Honey Mustard Double Crunch Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Soft Baked Mini Cookies Red Velvet is the clear winner. With 36 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Soft Baked Mini Cookies Red Velvet contains significantly more sugar (29.166666666667g) compared to the milder Honey Mustard Double Crunch Potato Chips (7.1428571428571g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Honey Mustard Double Crunch Potato Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Soft Baked Mini Cookies Red Velvet or Honey Mustard Double Crunch Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. Soft Baked Mini Cookies Red Velvet has 500 calories, while Honey Mustard Double Crunch Potato Chips has 535.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Soft Baked Mini Cookies Red Velvet vegan?

No, Soft Baked Mini Cookies Red Velvet is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Soft Baked Mini Cookies Red Velvet and Honey Mustard Double Crunch Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 36 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.