Head-to-Head Analysis

Solid Tuna Fillet In Spring Water vs Wild Caught Pink Salmon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Solid Tuna Fillet In Spring Water

Solid Tuna Fillet In Spring Water

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Wild Caught Pink Salmon

Wild Caught Pink Salmon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
81 kcal
Energy
97.3 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0.5g
Fat
1.8g
19g
Protein
19.5g
0.5g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Solid Tuna Fillet In Spring Water and Wild Caught Pink Salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Solid Tuna Fillet In Spring Water is the clear winner. With 16 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Solid Tuna Fillet In Spring Water or Wild Caught Pink Salmon?

It depends on your goals. Solid Tuna Fillet In Spring Water has 81 calories, while Wild Caught Pink Salmon has 97.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Solid Tuna Fillet In Spring Water vegan?

No, Solid Tuna Fillet In Spring Water is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Solid Tuna Fillet In Spring Water and Wild Caught Pink Salmon?

There is a difference of 16 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.