Head-to-Head Analysis

Solid White Albacore Tuna vs Atlantic Salmon Fillet

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Solid White Albacore Tuna

Solid White Albacore Tuna

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Atlantic Salmon Fillet

Atlantic Salmon Fillet

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
97.3 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0.9g
Fat
0g
23g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Solid White Albacore Tuna and Atlantic Salmon Fillet side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Solid White Albacore Tuna is the more energy-dense option here, packing 97 more calories per 100g than Atlantic Salmon Fillet. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Solid White Albacore Tuna offers a protein boost with 23g per 100g, outperforming Atlantic Salmon Fillet in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Solid White Albacore Tuna or Atlantic Salmon Fillet?

It depends on your goals. Solid White Albacore Tuna has 97.3 calories, while Atlantic Salmon Fillet has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Solid White Albacore Tuna vegan?

No, Solid White Albacore Tuna is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Solid White Albacore Tuna and Atlantic Salmon Fillet?

There is a difference of 97 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.