Head-to-Head Analysis

Solid White Albacore Tuna vs Hardwood smoked oysters

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Solid White Albacore Tuna

Solid White Albacore Tuna

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Hardwood smoked oysters

Hardwood smoked oysters

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
97.3 kcal
Energy
208 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0.9g
Fat
12.3g
23g
Protein
18.9g
0.7g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Solid White Albacore Tuna and Hardwood smoked oysters side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Solid White Albacore Tuna is the clear winner. With 111 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Solid White Albacore Tuna offers a protein boost with 23g per 100g, outperforming Hardwood smoked oysters in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Solid White Albacore Tuna or Hardwood smoked oysters?

It depends on your goals. Solid White Albacore Tuna has 97.3 calories, while Hardwood smoked oysters has 208 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Solid White Albacore Tuna vegan?

No, Solid White Albacore Tuna is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Solid White Albacore Tuna and Hardwood smoked oysters?

There is a difference of 111 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.