Head-to-Head Analysis

Solid White Albacore Tuna vs Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Solid White Albacore Tuna

Solid White Albacore Tuna

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon

Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
97.3 kcal
Energy
141.2 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0.9g
Fat
5.9g
23g
Protein
23.5g
0.7g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Solid White Albacore Tuna and Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Solid White Albacore Tuna is the clear winner. With 44 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Solid White Albacore Tuna or Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon?

It depends on your goals. Solid White Albacore Tuna has 97.3 calories, while Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has 141.176470588235 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Solid White Albacore Tuna vegan?

No, Solid White Albacore Tuna is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Solid White Albacore Tuna and Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon?

There is a difference of 44 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.