Solid white albacore tuna in water vs Clams
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Solid white albacore tuna in water
Clams
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Solid white albacore tuna in water and Clams side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Solid white albacore tuna in water is the more energy-dense option here, packing 20 more calories per 100g than Clams. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Solid white albacore tuna in water takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Clams contains 1.5384615384615g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Solid white albacore tuna in water offers a protein boost with 23g per 100g, outperforming Clams in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Solid white albacore tuna in water or Clams?
It depends on your goals. Solid white albacore tuna in water has 97.3 calories, while Clams has 76.923076923077 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Solid white albacore tuna in water vegan?
No, Solid white albacore tuna in water is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Solid white albacore tuna in water and Clams?
There is a difference of 20 calories per 100g between the two products.
