Solid white albacore tuna in water vs Wild herring fillets
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Solid white albacore tuna in water
Wild herring fillets
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Solid white albacore tuna in water and Wild herring fillets side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Solid white albacore tuna in water is the clear winner. With 103 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Solid white albacore tuna in water takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Wild herring fillets contains 2g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Solid white albacore tuna in water offers a protein boost with 23g per 100g, outperforming Wild herring fillets in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Solid white albacore tuna in water or Wild herring fillets?
Solid white albacore tuna in water appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Solid white albacore tuna in water vegan?
No, Solid white albacore tuna in water is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Solid white albacore tuna in water and Wild herring fillets?
There is a difference of 103 calories per 100g between the two products.
