Head-to-Head Analysis

Solid White Albacore Tuna in Water vs Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Solid White Albacore Tuna in Water

Solid White Albacore Tuna in Water

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon

Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
125 kcal
Energy
118 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
1.8g
Fat
4.1g
23.2g
Protein
20g
0.5g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Solid White Albacore Tuna in Water and Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Solid White Albacore Tuna in Water is the more energy-dense option here, packing 7 more calories per 100g than Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Solid White Albacore Tuna in Water offers a protein boost with 23.21g per 100g, outperforming Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Solid White Albacore Tuna in Water or Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon?

It depends on your goals. Solid White Albacore Tuna in Water has 125 calories, while Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon has 118 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Solid White Albacore Tuna in Water vegan?

No, Solid White Albacore Tuna in Water is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Solid White Albacore Tuna in Water and Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon?

There is a difference of 7 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.