Head-to-Head Analysis

Solid White Albacore, Wild Tuna, In Water, No Salt Added vs Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Solid White Albacore, Wild Tuna, In Water, No Salt Added

Solid White Albacore, Wild Tuna, In Water, No Salt Added

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel

Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
124 kcal
Energy
275 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0.4g
Fat
22.5g
29.2g
Protein
18.8g
0.3g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Solid White Albacore, Wild Tuna, In Water, No Salt Added and Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Solid White Albacore, Wild Tuna, In Water, No Salt Added is the clear winner. With 151 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Solid White Albacore, Wild Tuna, In Water, No Salt Added offers a protein boost with 29.2g per 100g, outperforming Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Solid White Albacore, Wild Tuna, In Water, No Salt Added or Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel?

It depends on your goals. Solid White Albacore, Wild Tuna, In Water, No Salt Added has 124 calories, while Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel has 275 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Solid White Albacore, Wild Tuna, In Water, No Salt Added vegan?

No, Solid White Albacore, Wild Tuna, In Water, No Salt Added is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Solid White Albacore, Wild Tuna, In Water, No Salt Added and Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel?

There is a difference of 151 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.