Head-to-Head Analysis

Sour Blue Raspberry Strips vs Trident gum cinnamon sugar free1x3 pk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sour Blue Raspberry Strips

Sour Blue Raspberry Strips

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Trident gum cinnamon sugar free1x3 pk

Trident gum cinnamon sugar free1x3 pk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
219 kcal
Energy
263 kcal
12.5g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
3.1g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sour Blue Raspberry Strips and Trident gum cinnamon sugar free1x3 pk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sour Blue Raspberry Strips is the clear winner. With 44 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sour Blue Raspberry Strips contains significantly more sugar (12.5g) compared to the milder Trident gum cinnamon sugar free1x3 pk (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Trident gum cinnamon sugar free1x3 pk is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sour Blue Raspberry Strips offers a protein boost with 3.12g per 100g, outperforming Trident gum cinnamon sugar free1x3 pk in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sour Blue Raspberry Strips or Trident gum cinnamon sugar free1x3 pk?

It depends on your goals. Sour Blue Raspberry Strips has 219 calories, while Trident gum cinnamon sugar free1x3 pk has 263 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sour Blue Raspberry Strips vegan?

No, Sour Blue Raspberry Strips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sour Blue Raspberry Strips and Trident gum cinnamon sugar free1x3 pk?

There is a difference of 44 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.