Head-to-Head Analysis

Sour gold bears vs Great value Crunchy Potato chips salted original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sour gold bears

Sour gold bears

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Great value Crunchy Potato chips salted original

Great value Crunchy Potato chips salted original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
355 kcal
Energy
571.4 kcal
51.6g
Sugars
3.6g
0g
Fat
35.7g
6.5g
Protein
3.6g
0.1g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sour gold bears and Great value Crunchy Potato chips salted original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sour gold bears is the clear winner. With 216 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sour gold bears contains significantly more sugar (51.6g) compared to the milder Great value Crunchy Potato chips salted original (3.5714g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Great value Crunchy Potato chips salted original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sour gold bears offers a protein boost with 6.45g per 100g, outperforming Great value Crunchy Potato chips salted original in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sour gold bears or Great value Crunchy Potato chips salted original?

It depends on your goals. Sour gold bears has 355 calories, while Great value Crunchy Potato chips salted original has 571.4286 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sour gold bears vegan?

No, Sour gold bears is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sour gold bears and Great value Crunchy Potato chips salted original?

There is a difference of 216 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.